Web Application
Testing
Identify OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws.

Detect. Analyze. Secure. Before Attackers Find the Gap First.
Your LLM is answering customer questions. Your copilot is touching internal systems. Your agent is calling APIs and making decisions with no humans in the loop. None of that was tested the way it needs to be. Traditional penetration testing was built for a world of static code and known attack signatures. AI systems don’t fail that way, they fail through manipulated prompts, poisoned data, and models that do exactly what they’re told by exactly the wrong person. This isn’t a checklist audit. It’s an actual attempt to jailbreak, poison, and exfiltrate through your AI stack.
AI systems introduce attack surfaces that traditional security assessments were never built to test.
Common triggers: AI product launch · cloud or AI infrastructure migration · compliance audit · cyber insurance requirement · major model change · M&A · security incident · agent deployment.
A standard engagement runs 1–3 weeks depending on scope — and retesting is included, not sold as an add-on.
We test your entire digital environment using advanced methodologies and AI-driven tools.
Identify OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws.
Find vulnerabilities in internal and external networks.
Secure your iOS and Android applications.
Assess AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and hybrid environments.
Detect and exploit API vulnerabilities.
Identify risks in Wi-Fi networks and access points.
Test human defenses against phishing and manipulation.
Secure connected devices and embedded systems.
If your product runs on an LLM — OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Llama, or a self-hosted fine-tuned model — your attack surface looks nothing like a traditional web application, and most vendors haven't built an AI penetration testing service for LLM applications that accounts for the difference.
Every AI penetration testing service for LLM applications engagement targets the full trust boundary of your stack: system prompt exposure, instruction hierarchy bypass, tool call exploitation, RAG injection, retrieval poisoning, and output manipulation that slips past your safety guardrails without tripping a single alert.

Nine common triggers for testing AI systems.
Establish a testing baseline before release.
Catch new configuration and integration risks.
Provide evidence of security testing.
Address AI security questions from insurers.
Reassess risk after model or infrastructure changes.
Assess inherited AI systems and dependencies.
Investigate exposure and validate fixes.
Test autonomy, permissions and tool access.
Keep pace with changing models, prompts and threats.
Test at launch, after major changes and on a regular cadence.

Prompt injection, jailbreaks & system prompts.
Adversarial scenarios across the AI product.
Tampered documents, sources & embeddings.
Excessive agency & unauthorized tool actions.
Extraction, inversion & membership inference.
Manipulated inputs & unsafe decisions.
Auth, plugin abuse & business logic.
PII, PHI, credentials & confidential data.
RBAC, privilege escalation & identity.
Insecure code, secrets & dependencies.
Endpoints, containers, AWS, Azure & GCP.
Text, image, audio & video payloads.
Every finding is manually validated and exploit-confirmed before it reaches your report — never a scanner output relabeled as a pentest finding.

Structured around the OWASP GenAI and Agentic AI Top 10, across five core vectors:
Target definition, autonomous multi-agent recon, automated proof-of-exploit generation, and human validation of every automated finding. Every autonomous tool runs inside a strict human-in-the-loop containment model — hardcoded safety parameters prevent any automated tool from causing unintended impact on your production environment.

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications · OWASP GenAI Security Project · OWASP Agentic AI Security Guidance · MITRE ATLAS · MITRE ATT&CK · NIST AI RMF · NIST SP 800-115 · PTES · ISO/IEC 42001 · ISO/IEC 23894.
They shape how every engagement is scoped, executed, and reported — from the first threat model to the final attestation letter.
Prompt injection, disclosure & output risks.
Generative AI security guidance.
Tool use, autonomy & identity risks.
Adversarial AI tactics and techniques.
Enterprise attack behavior & infrastructure.
Govern · Map · Measure · Manage.
Technical security testing methodology.
End-to-end penetration test execution.
AI management systems & governance.
AI risk identification & treatment.
If your organization has shipped anything with a model behind it, this applies to you. The pattern holds across every sector we work with:
Generative AI touching real users or real data
Access to tools, APIs or databases; actions without approval at every step
Finance, healthcare & government; PCI DSS, HIPAA or FedRAMP exposure
AI embedded in products, platforms or customer-facing APIs
Used across engineering, support or internal operations
Preparing for ISO/IEC 42001 or NIST AI RMF assessments
Here’s the simple rule we test against: if your AI can access sensitive data, make a decision, generate business-critical output, talk to a customer, or take an action through a tool or API, it belongs in your security program, not outside it.
From initial scope to validated findings and remediation, follow a clear, evidence-led process.
Agree on assets, priorities, rules of engagement and the business outcomes that matter.

Examine controls and attack paths, then validate relevant findings with evidence.

Translate technical findings into business impact, ownership and actionable fixes.

Reassess agreed fixes and provide evidence of closure and residual risk.

Penetration testing is a simulated cyber attack against your systems, networks, applications or cloud environment to identify security vulnerabilities before real attackers can exploit them.
AI-assisted analysis helps correlate findings, identify attack paths and prioritize risks while expert testers validate meaningful weaknesses.
Frequency depends on your risk, compliance needs and rate of change. Many organizations test annually and after major changes.
Yes. Findings include prioritized remediation guidance, with retesting available to validate fixes.
Testing can support objectives associated with ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and other security requirements.